Recently I was trying to understand what’s behind the mysterious condition
for elements (
) to define an element
in the Bloch group. It appears that the condition naturally appears if one studies hyperbolic
-manifolds.
Let be an abelian group. Let
be a triangulated oriented
-dimensional manifold. Let
be an oriented
-dimensional simplex of the triangulation.
Definition
An angle structure on is a collection of
elements of
, denoted
, one for each edge
satisfying relations:
We think of as the angle between the faces of
meeting at
.
We have
This, in particular, implies
Suppose each tetrahedron of the triangulation has an angle structure. The corresponding angles will be denoted , which means the angle between
and
, i.e. for a simplex
we have
elements listed below:
Let us define additionally
Therefore the notation is invariant with respect to even permutations of vertices of .
Definition
For each edge of
let
be the
-simplices adjacent to
with
, and
. Suppose the following condition is satisfied:
Then we call our manifold angled.
Suppose we have a finite set of tetrahedra with angle structure. Is it possible to glue them together and obtain an angled oriented manifold? We provide a necessary condition.
Theorem
In an angled oriented manifold the following condition is satisfied in the group :
the sum is over the -simplices which compose the fundamental class of the manifold.
Note that if is invertible in
, then the terms
and
are
.
Remark
Let and each tetrahedron is realized as an ideal tetrahedron in the hyperbolic
-space
with cross-ratio
. Then its angles are
,
,
. To make the product
one can change angles to
,
,
. Then we see that up to
-torsion the sum of tensors
is
, which is well known. In other words, hyperbolic
-manifolds provide elements in the Bloch group. However our approach seems to be more general.
The rest of this text provides a proof of the theorem.
Suppose is angled. Then we can construct elements
with the property
for each oriented simplex . If
is another such family then there is a family
with
Fix a vertex . Let
and
be edges. Join
and
by a sequence of triangles
for
,
,
. Put
This does not depend on the choice of the sequence since for any oriented -simplex
we have
Therefore there is a family with the property
If is another such family, there exists a family
with
In particular for any -simplex
we have
We see that we can replace with
to make
satisfying
If is another family with this condition then there is a family
with the property
Put . Then for any oriented
-simplex
Therefore there exists a family (this
is different from the one used before) with property
This means that for any -simplex
we have
Let us summarize the properties of :
Let be a
-simplex. Then
Consider the following element in :
This element is invariant under cyclic permutations:
Moreover,
Since and
, we can also write
as
Let
For any oriented -simplex
put
Then
We may rewrite
Therefore
Taking into account that
we obtain
Now we turn to .
Therefore
We see that depends only on the angles and its sum over the manifold is zero. If
is invertible in
then
This specializes to in the case of ideal hyperbolic tertrahedron.

No comments yet
Comments feed for this article